Frequency Pulling Effect — What It Is

YS-307 achieves frequency stabilization by leveraging the frequency pulling effect caused by the anomalous dispersion of the laser gain medium.

Because the control signal is in the frequency domain and the oscillation mode can be stabilized at the center of the Ne gain curve, the stabilization based on frequency pulling enables:

  • Frequency stability of 10-11 over a wide range of averaging times (from 1 s to 1,000 s)
  • 3 mW single-mode output
  • ±300 kHz resettability (frequency reproducibility after power cycling)

Principle of the Frequency Pulling Effect

The frequency pulling phenomenon occurs when the oscillation mode inside the Ne gain curve is slightly pulled toward the center of the gain curve from the cavity phase condition mode position νm, resulting in an actual oscillation frequency ν (Fig. 1(a)).

The pulling amount ν − νm depends on the shape of the Ne gain curve and varies with the mode position νm (Fig. 1(b)). When multiple longitudinal modes exist, the beat frequency between modes changes with their oscillation positions. We extract this change as a control signal and perform stabilization.

Schematic of the Frequency Pulling Effect relative to the Ne gain curve (ν, νm, beat frequency)
Schematic showing how the pulling amount (ν − νm) varies with the oscillation mode position νm

Fig. 1 Frequency Pulling Effect

Stabilization Utilizing the Frequency Pulling Effect (YS-307)

Overview of the stabilization control

Following the YS-307 system configuration (Fig. 2):

Block diagram of the YS-307 stabilization: APD sensing, Control Signal Generation, Reference Signal Generation (crystal oscillator), Frequency Difference Detection, f-to-V and Zero-Convergence Loop; the loop locks fb − fref = 0.
Fig. 2 YS-307 system configuration
  • Changes in beat frequency between multiple modes produced by frequency pulling are extracted and used as the control signal.
  • The P and S polarizations in the back beam are combined by the polarizer (PL1), coupled into an optical fiber, and detected by an avalanche photodiode (APD) inside the controller.
  • The APD converts variations due to frequency pulling into changes of the control signal frequency fb.
  • fb is compared with a crystal-oscillator reference frequency fref using a frequency difference detector, and the heater current of the laser tube is controlled so that (fb − fref = 0), stabilizing the frequency.

To obtain maximum power in single-mode operation, the oscillation mode position is set at the center of the Ne gain curve (configurable via fref).

Advantages over polarization-intensity stabilization

  • Stabilization of the mode position at the center of the Ne gain curve without frequency modulation
  • Robust to contamination-induced variation on cavity mirrors or detectors because the control quantity is frequency
  • Digital processing of the control signal reduces sensitivity to temperature-dependent drift in analog components

Technologies that Support Stabilization (YS-307)

Lock-point setting with temperature effects in mind

The Ne gain curve changes its shape with ambient temperature, affecting the relationship between mode position and control signal. In YS-307, referencing the iodine-stabilized laser used as a secondary length standard in the traceability system, we select a lock point with minimal sensitivity to ambient temperature, defined by (fb − fref = 0) (Fig. 3).

Relationship between oscillation mode position and control signal fb–fref under ambient temperature variation (lock-point setting)
Fig. 3 Relationship Between Oscillation Mode Position and Control Signal fb − fref Under Ambient Temperature Variation

Two-stage stabilization robust to ambient temperature variation

YS-307 combines (1) conventional proportional control and (2) a proprietary zero-convergence, accumulated integral control. This two-stage scheme maintains (fb − fref = 0) regardless of ambient temperature changes (Fig. 4(a)). With proportional control alone, fb − fref varies with temperature (Fig. 4(b)). The two-stage design mitigates such influence.

Stabilized behavior with two-stage control (YS-307)
(a) Two-stage control (YS-307)
Behavior with proportional control only (temperature-induced variation)
(b) Proportional control alone

Fig. 4 Comparison of Stabilization Schemes

Dual-heater architecture to broaden the operating temperature range

YS-307 uses two heaters (main and sub) to control cavity length. The main heater performs stabilization; the sub heater compensates for ambient temperature drift. This dual-heater design expands the effective operating range of the two-stage control. Our measurements confirm proper operation over ±20 °C around a 25 °C start condition.

10-11 Stability Across a Wide Range of Averaging Times

With these stabilization technologies, YS-307 achieves 10-11 stability over averaging times from 1 s to 1,000 s. Fig. 5 compares stability with a product using polarization-intensity stabilization (our QS series).

Frequency stability (Allan deviation): comparison of YS-307 versus QS
Fig. 5 Frequency Stability (Allan Deviation)